1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 265 Wis.
  5. 265 Wis. 627 (1954)
 

MAUS v. BLOSS

265 Wis. 627 (1954)

MAUS, Respondent, vs. BLOSS, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 2, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Hammond & Hammond, attorneys, and Cavanagh, Mittelstaed, Sheldon & Heide of counsel, all of Kenosha, and oral argument by Walter W. Hammond and Willis R. Hammond.

For the respondent there was a brief by Lepp & Phillips of Kenosha, and oral argument by Burton Lepp.

GEHL, J.

Defendant contends that his operation of a mink farm is an enterprise excluded from the operation of the safe-place statute. The statute applies to all places of employment except, among other operations, "farm labor when the employer is the farmer operating the farm and the labor is such as is customarily performed as a part of farming, and including the transportation of farm products immediately and directly from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases