1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 202 Or.
  5. 202 Or. 690 (1954)
 

KELLEY ET UX. v. MALLORY ET UX.

202 Or. 690 (1954)

277 P.2d 767

KELLEY ET UX. v. MALLORY ET UX.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 15, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Conway, Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellants.

James P. Powers, Portland, and George G. Van Natta, St. Helens, argued the cause for respondents. With them on the briefs were Joseph & Powers and D.C. Bond, Portland.

Before LATOURETTE, Chief Justice, and WARNER, BRAND and PERRY, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, J.

This is a suit for an accounting. From a decree dismissing the plaintiffs' complaint with prejudice, they appeal.

On April 2, 1948, the respondents as the first parties and the appellants as the second parties entered into an agreement (hereinafter referred to as "the agreement"), the pertinent parts of which read as follows:

"That the said parties of the first part own and operate a Sales and Service of automobiles, trucks...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases