STATE v. SPRUILL


16 N.J. 73 (1954)

106 A.2d 278

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LOUIS SPRUILL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 28, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George R. Sommer argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Harold Kolovsky argued the cause for the State (Mr. David H. Harris, Special Deputy Attorney-General, and Mr. David M. Satz, Jr., Deputy Attorney-General, on the brief).


The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER, J.

Defendant was convicted in the Law Division of the Superior Court upon an indictment charging that he was guilty of criminal nonfeasance in that he did "continuously, unlawfully and wilfully" fail, neglect and omit, contrary to his public duty as a duly appointed patrolman of the Rutherford Police Department, to suppress a disorderly house maintained on or about the first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases