MATTER OF HAYES v. STROOCK & CO.


283 A.D. 578 (1954)

In the Matter of the Claim of Patrick Hayes, Respondent, v. S. Stroock & Co., Inc., et al., Appellants Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

March 31, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert P. Thill for appellants.

John W. Sweeney for claimant-respondent.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Harry Pastor and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

FOSTER, P. J., COON, HALPERN and IMRIE, JJ., concur.


BERGAN, J.

The issue of law here before us is to determine whether there is substantial evidence, when the medical record is considered as a whole, to support an award by the Workmen's Compensation Board. The law problem that thus arises on what is "substantial" medical proof when the case is seen as an entity is in an area not easily defined.

Records which have not been regarded as providing substantial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases