om/images/logo.png">
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

BUCHANAN v. METZ

No. 12-CV-15511.

132 F.Supp.3d 922 (2015)

John C. BUCHANAN, Jr., Plaintiff, v. James W. METZ II and Donovan Motley, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

Signed September 14, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth A. Downey , Elizabeth A. Downey, P.C., Jeffrey T. Stewart , Seikaly Stewart & Bennett P.C., Farmington Hills, MI, for Plaintiff.

Joseph T. Froehlich , Mark E. Donnelly , Rock A. Wood , Michigan Department of Attorney General, Lansing, MI, for Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

This civil rights litigation arises out of Plaintiff John C. Buchanan, Jr.'s involvement in attempting to redevelop a manufacturing plant into a film studio and claim a credit under Michigan's Film and Digital...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    BRADFORD FUNERAL SERVICE | 76 So.2d 783 (1954) | so2d7831833 | Leagle.com
     

    BRADFORD FUNERAL SERVICE v. BURKS

    6 Div. 987.

    76 So.2d 783 (1954)

    BRADFORD FUNERAL SERVICE, Inc. v. Bettle BURKS.

    Court of Appeals of Alabama.

    December 28, 1954.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    McEniry, McEniry & McEniry, Bessemer, for appellant.

    Edw. L. Ball, Bessemer, for appellee.


    HARWOOD, Judge.

    Suit below was for the aggregate amount of weekly premiums paid by the plaintiff to the defendant on a burial insurance policy. The plaintiff had paid the premiums from June 1941 until March 1951, when, as alleged in count 1 of the complaint, "the plaintiff discovered * * * she was uninsurable," and thereafter made demand for the return of the premiums, which demand was refused by the defendant.

    The cause was submitted to the court without...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases