ZELIFF v. SABATINO


15 N.J. 70 (1954)

104 A.2d 54

DAVID ZELIFF, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. ALFONSO SABATINO, FILOMENA SABATINO, AND A. ALBERT URDANG, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 29, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold D. Feuerstein argued the cause for the appellants, cross-respondents, Alfonso Sabatino and Filomena Sabatino (Messrs. Lipstein and Lipstein, attorneys).

Mr. Abraham I. Mayer argued the cause for the appellant, cross-respondent, A. Albert Urdang (Messrs. Mayer and Mayer, attorneys).

Mr. Jerome C. Eisenberg argued the cause for the respondent, cross-appellant (Mr. Mervin G. Wiener, attorney; Messrs. Eisenberg and Spicer, of counsel; Mr. Jerome C. Eisenberg and Mr. Ralph Neibart on the brief).


The opinion of the court was delivered by OLIPHANT, J.

This action was one for damages allegedly resulting from a written representation made by defendants in connection with the sale of real property, later determined to be false. Judgment was entered upon a jury verdict in plaintiff's favor in the sum of $4,200 against all of the defendants. The defendants appealed and the Appellate Division held that defendants' liability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases