1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 123 Cal.App.2d
  5. 123 Cal.App.2d 696 (1954)
 

MULLER v. JUSTICE'S COURT

Docket No. 15792.

123 Cal.App.2d 696 (1954)

267 P.2d 406

WILLIAM MULLER, Appellant, v. JUSTICE'S COURT OF THE THIRD TOWNSHIP et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

March 8, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Muller, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, and Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondents.

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

[1] Question: When a verified complaint charging a violation of section 499 of the Penal Code is presented to the judge of a justice's court, must the judge before filing the complaint and issuing process thereon examine the case, take evidence and determine therefrom that there is reasonable and probable cause to believe that the offense charged has been committed and that the defendant committed it?*

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases