TUMMINELLO v. TUMMINELLO

[No. 46, October Term, 1954.]

205 Md. 609 (1954)

109 A.2d 776

TUMMINELLO v. TUMMINELLO

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 13, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur R. Padgett, with whom was Edwin J. Wolfe, on the brief, for appellant.

Samuel S. Smalkin, with whom were H. Beale Rollins and Ginsberg and Ginsberg, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON HAMMOND, JJ.


HAMMOND, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The wife complains in this appeal that the alimony granted her in a suit for separate maintenance, and the allowance to her counsel, are inadequate. The husband did not appeal from the decree, so that the right to alimony is not before us — merely the amount.

The husband is a professional man, a physician, whose income subject to tax, after deduction of business expenses, is approximately $11,000 a year...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases