CRAIN BROTHERS v. WIEMAN & WARD COMPANY

Nos. 192, 235.

126 F.Supp. 675 (1954)

CRAIN BROTHERS, Inc., Owner of Steel Hopper Barges THE C.B. 325 and THE C.B. 330, Libellant, v. The WIEMAN & WARD COMPANY, Respondent (UNION BARGE LINE CORPORATION, Third Party Respondent). The WIEMAN & WARD COMPANY, Libellant, v. UNION BARGE LINE CORPORATION, Respondent (CRAIN BROTHERS, Inc., Third Party Respondent).

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

December 16, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harland I. Casteel (of Campbell, Houck & Thomas), Pittsburgh, Pa., for Crain Bros.

J. Wray Connolly (of Moorhead & Knox), Pittsburgh, Pa., for Wieman Ward & Co., respondent.

John R. Bredin (of Dalzell, Pringle, Bredin & Martin), Pittsburgh, Pa., for Union Barge Line Corp.

Ira R. Hill (of Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay), Pittsburgh, Pa., for Wieman Ward & Co., libellant.


GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

In this admiralty proceeding the same parties are involved in two separate actions which arise out of the same series of events.

Crain Brothers, Inc., was the owner of barges used to transport coal and industrial materials on inland waterways. Union Barge Line Corporation was the managing owner of tow boats engaged in transporting barges of the type owned by Crain Brothers, Inc.

The Wieman & Ward Company was a wholesale vendor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases