1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 128 F.Supp.
  5. 128 F.Supp. 662 (1954)
 

ISBRANDTSEN COMPANY v. LENAGHAN

128 F.Supp. 662 (1954)

ISBRANDTSEN COMPANY, Inc., Libellant, v. Henry P. LENAGHAN and Henry P. Lenaghan & Sons, Limited, Respondents.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

May 24, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lord, Day & Lord, New York City, John W. Castles, New York City, of counsel, for libellant.

Nelson, Healy, Baillie & Burke, New York City, Nicholas J. Healy, 3rd, New York City, of counsel, for respondent Henry P. Lenaghan & Sons, Limited, appearing specially.

CONGER, District Judge.

Motion by Henry P. Lenaghan & Sons, Ltd. to vacate the attachment of the m. v. Dundalk Bay pursuant to Local Admiralty Rule 21.

Libellant has sued Henry P. Lenaghan and Henry P. Lenaghan & Sons, Ltd., in a maritime cause arising out of a contract. Libellant claims that respondents have breached the terms of a charter to libellant of the m. s. Empire Glencoe and libellant is, therefore, claiming damage to the extent of over ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases