1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 200 Or.
  5. 200 Or. 588 (1954)
 

ZAHUMENSKY v. FANDRICH

200 Or. 588 (1954)

267 P.2d 664

ZAHUMENSKY v. FANDRICH

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 3, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan Weinstein, of Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

L.A. Recken, of Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Recken & Recken, of Portland.

Before LATOURETTE, Chief Justice, and WARNER, ROSSMAN, and PERRY, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PERRY, J.

Plaintiff brought an action against the defendant to recover for personal injuries suffered while riding as a paying guest in the defendant's automobile. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed.

Briefly the facts are: That the plaintiff and the defendant were both plasterers employed by one B.F. Smith on work being done in Newberg, Oregon. The parties resided in the city of Portland and there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases