BEATO v. DiPILATO


175 Pa.Super. 602 (1954)

Beato v. DiPilato, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

July 13, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rames J. Bucci, with him Bucci & Bucci, for appellants.

Albert H. Frankel, with him Frankel & Rosen, for appellees.

Before ROSS, GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE and ERVIN, JJ.


OPINION BY ERVIN, J., July 13, 1954:

This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to grant defendants' motions for a new trial and judgment non obstante veredicto, and entering judgment for the plaintiffs in an action by plaintiffs for return of deposit money paid on account of the purchase of certain real estate in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

On February 27, 1951 plaintiffs agreed to purchase...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases