MOGEN DAVID WINE CORP. v. BORENSTEIN


267 Wis. 503 (1954)

MOGEN DAVID WINE CORPORATION, Appellant, vs. BORENSTEIN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 5, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs and oral argument by Albert Bahcall, attorney, and Ray J. Aiken of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by Gold & McCann of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Ray T. McCann.


CURRIE, J.

Sec. 268.02 (1), Stats., provides as follows:

"(1) When it appears from his pleading that a party is entitled to judgment and any part thereof consists in restraining some act, the commission or continuance of which during the litigation would injure him, or when during the litigation it shall appear that a party is doing or threatens or is about to do, or is procuring or suffering some act to be done in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases