1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 134 F.Supp.
  5. 134 F.Supp. 636 (1954)
 

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY R. CO. v. THE W. C. HARMS

No. 1081.

134 F.Supp. 636 (1954)

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, Libellant, v. THE W. C. HARMS and H. W. A. Harms, dba Harms Towing Company, Respondents.

United States District Court S. D. Texas, Houston Division.

May 17, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski (Sweeney J. Doehring), Houston, Tex., for libellant.

Eastham, Hinds & Dale (Dan H. Hinds), Houston, Tex., for respondents.

KENNERLY, Chief Judge.

A collision between a fast passenger train and a river barge is unusual, but not impossible, as this Record discloses. This suit is by libellant, a Railroad Company, against a tug and barge, and their owner and operator, for damages alleged to have been caused Railroad Company by such a collision.

Libellant, Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, is a railroad corporation, maintaining railroad lines or tracks between St....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases