POMEROY v. SIMON


17 N.J. 59 (1954)

110 A.2d 19

ALFRED POMEROY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A COPARTNER OF SELWYN-POMEROY CO., A PARTNERSHIP, SAUL FISCHBEIN AND KARL GREEN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HARRY SIMON, ARTHUR J. SIMON, EDWARD H. SIMON AND HELEN SIMON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARTNERS TRADING AS EAGLE BUTTON COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 20, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Max L. Rosenstein argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Adrian M. Unger argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Sam Denstman, on the brief; Messrs. Milton M. and Adrian M. Unger, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER, J.

The essential question here is whether the plaintiff corporate shareholders may have recourse to the Attachment Act, N.J.S. 2A:26-1 et seq., in a stockholders' derivative action against nonresident officers and directors of the corporation for the construction and rescission of a sales agency agreement allegedly procured from the corporation by fraud and used by defendants to mulct the corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases