BLAICH & STIEGLER v. MANHASSET PARK CO.


206 Misc. 541 (1954)

Blaich & Stiegler, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Manhasset Park Company, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

August 24, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Rosenberg for defendant.

Kenneth D. Molloy for plaintiff.


HALLINAN, J.

In an action for breach of contract, the defendant moves, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Defendant relies, however, upon plaintiff's bill of particulars, to which is annexed an exchange of letters between the parties which defendant contends do not spell out any contract, but merely an invitation to bid, followed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases