1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 124 Cal.App.2d
  5. 124 Cal.App.2d 622 (1954)
 

HINTON v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Docket No. 15827.

124 Cal.App.2d 622 (1954)

269 P.2d 154

GERTRUDE M. HINTON, Respondent, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants; GEORGE L. RICHARDSON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

April 20, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George L. Richardson, in pro. per., Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon for Appellant.

Howard Magee and Philander Brooks Beadle for Respondent.

BRAY, J.

After a judgment against him in the sum of $10,000 and the denials of motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for new trial, defendant Richardson (apparently the only defendant served with process) appeals.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Sufficiency of the evidence to show that the push-button traffic signal control device was defective or dangerous.

2. Was plaintiff's injury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases