MATTER OF AUER v. DRESSEL


306 N.Y. 427 (1954)

In the Matter of Joseph L. Auer on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All of Holders of Class a Stock of R. Hoe & Co., Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Arthur Dressel, Individually and as President of R. Hoe & Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 12, 1954


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Orison S. Marden, Neil P. Cullom, Thomas F. Peterson, John M. Johnston and Robert D. Cole for appellants.

Bruce A. Hecker, John R. Stevenson, John Kadel, Abraham Wilson and David M. Potts for respondents.

LEWIS, Ch. J., DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ., concur with DESMOND, J.; VAN VOORHIS, J., dissents in opinion in which CONWAY, J., concurs.


DESMOND, J.

This article 78 of the Civil Practice Act proceeding was brought by class A stockholders of appellant R. Hoe & Co., Inc., for an order in the nature of mandamus to compel the president of Hoe to comply with a positive duty imposed on him by the corporation's by-laws. Section 2 of article I of those by-laws says that "It shall be the duty of the President to call a special meeting whenever requested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases