1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 43 Cal.2d
  5. 43 Cal.2d 686 (1954)
 

SHOEMAKE v. WILSEY

Docket No. Sac. 6483.

43 Cal.2d 686 (1954)

277 P.2d 17

ERNEST SHOEMAKE, Appellant, v. PHYLLIS H. WILSEY et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

December 3, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burke & Rawles and John E. Nelson for Appellant.

Mannon & Brazier, Irving M. Brazier and Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon for Respondents.

SCHAUER, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in his action to recover for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. We have concluded that the jury were properly instructed, that the evidence sustains the verdict, and that the judgment should be affirmed.

While plaintiff as a pedestrian was attempting to cross State Street (a north-south thoroughfare), within a marked crosswalk,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases