SLATER v. GULF, MOBILE & OHIO R. R. CO.


307 N.Y. 419 (1954)

William A. Slater et al., as Trustees under The Will of William A. Slater, Deceased, Respondents, v. Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad Company et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 14, 1954


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward K. Hanlon and Milton Weiss for Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad Company, appellant.

William R. Meagher, Theodore Kiendl and Samuel J. Murray for Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, appellant.

Watson Washburn and William P. Jones for respondents.

LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., concur.


FROESSEL, J.

By our affirmance of the Appellate Division in the previous action (Slater v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio R. R. Co., 304 N.Y. 636, affg. 279 App. Div. 166), we agreed that the letters of May 25, 1945, did not constitute a contract, and that there was no factual basis for the second cause of action either on the theory of fraud or unjust enrichment. Our determination was not based...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases