CITY OF DALLAS et al.
v.
CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD et al.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued April 12, 1954.
Decided May 20, 1954.
Petition for Rehearing Denied June 17, 1954.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. Thomas F. Daly, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Joseph W. Wyatt, Samuel C. Caldwell, Harry A. Inman, Washington, D. C., and John R. Mahoney, New York City, were on the brief, for petitioners.
Mr. James L. Highsaw, Jr., Chief, Litigation and Research Division, Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Emory T. Nunneley, Jr., Gen. Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, and John H. Wanner, Associate Gen. Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for respondent.
Mr. Charles H. Weston, Atty. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for respondent.
Mr. Cecil A. Beasley, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Dyer J. Taylor, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for intervenors City of Fort Worth, Texas, and the Chamber of Commerce of Fort Worth, Texas.
Mr. Eugene B. Thomas, Jr., Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for intervenors City of Fort Worth, Texas, and the Chamber of Commerce of Fort Worth, Texas.
Mr. Robert W. Oliver, Washington, D. C., for intervenor Central Airlines, Inc.
Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN and BAZELON, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
BAZELON, Circuit Judge.
Central Airlines applied to the Civil Aeronautics Board for authorization to operate a new route segment between the terminal points of Fort Worth, Texas, and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, via five intermediate points, one of which was Dallas, Texas. After full public hearing, the Board entered an order granting the requested authority, except that Dallas and Fort Worth, which are thirty-one miles apart, were treated as a single terminal point with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
