1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 45 Wn.2d
  5. 45 Wn.2d 675 (1954)
 

LINDQUIST v. MULLEN

No. 32795.

45 Wn.2d 675 (1954)

277 P.2d 724

MABEL LINDQUIST, Appellant, v. BERNARD P. MULLEN et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 9, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl F. Christophersen and A.L. Newbould, for appellant.

Eggerman, Rosling & Williams and Allan R. Carpenter, Jr., for respondents.

MALLERY, J.

The trial court sustained defendant's demurrer. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of dismissal.

Appellant contends the trial court erred in holding that her action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations. RCW 4.16.080(2) [cf. Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 159].

The action is predicated upon the negligence of a physician, who will be referred to herein as if he were the sole

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases