HARDY v. ANDERSON

No. 36,129.

241 Minn. 478 (1954)

CLARENCE HARDY v. MILO ANDERSON.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 26, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis, Hammer, Heaney, Weyl & Halverson, for appellant.

Ryan, Ryan, Ryan & Ebert, for respondent.


MATSON, JUSTICE.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

1. Disappointing as it may be to an appellant, conflicts in evidence are to be resolved upon appeal by stating the controlling facts as the jury, in the light of the whole evidence, reasonably could and must have found them in arriving at its verdict. An appellate court cannot depart from this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases