HAFEMANN v. KORINEK


266 Wis. 450 (1954)

HAFEMANN and wife, Respondents, vs. KORINEK and wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 6, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Zillmer & Redford of Milwaukee, and oral argument by John M. Redford.

For the respondents there was a brief by George Barrock, attorney, and John J. Devos of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Devos and Mr. Barrock.


CURRIE, J.

The plaintiff lessees contend that the order denying defendants' motion for summary judgment was proper because the pleadings and affidavits raised material issues of fact. However, it has been repeatedly held that disputed questions of fact, where they are immaterial to the questions of law presented, do not afford a basis for denying an application for summary judgment. Carney-Rutter Agency v. Central Office Buildings (1953), 263...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases