1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 213 F.2d
  5. 213 F.2d 477 (1954)
 

BROTHERTON v. MERRITT-CHAPMAN & SCOTT CORP.

No. 227, Docket 22891.

213 F.2d 477 (1954)

BROTHERTON et al. v. MERRITT-CHAPMAN & SCOTT CORP.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided June 2, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts, New York City (Allen T. Klots, Merrell E. Clark, Arthur E. Pettit, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Guggenheimer & Untermyer, New York City (Abraham Shamos, Harry Hoffman, New York City, Norman Hammer, Leon H. Tykulsker, Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before CLARK, FRANK and MEDINA, Circuit Judges.

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. Article 13, especially when read in the light of SC-22b of the Specifications, was intended solely for the government's benefit and not for the benefit of other contractors as third-party beneficiaries. We think this so clear that we content ourselves with a mere citation of leading cases. See German Alliance Insurance Co. v. Home Water Co., 226 U.S. 220, 230, 33 S.Ct. 32, 57 L.Ed. 195; Moch Co. v. Rensselaer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases