ROOSE v. BOARD OF REVISION

No. 33782.

161 Ohio St. 522 (1954)

ROOSE, TRUSTEE, APPELLEE, v. BOARD OF REVISION OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 2, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Paul L. Holden, Mr. George Farr, Jr., and Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, for appellee.

Mr. Frank T. Cullitan, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Roger A. Zucker and Mr. Arthur E. Griffith, directors of law, and Mr. Frederick W. Frey, for appellants.


Per Curiam.

Appellants contend that the Board of Tax Appeals erred in failing to consider uniformity in this tax valuation appeal. As to this contention, appellants argue that, in setting the tax value of appellee's property at its true value in money, the board ignored the fact, which it had recognized in other proceedings before it (see State, ex rel. Curry et al., Bd. of County Commrs., v. Monroe, Treas., 159 Ohio St. 1<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases