1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 88 Pa.
  5. 88 Pa. D. & C. 590 (1954)
 

WEISSMAN ET UX. v. WEISSMAN ET AL.

88 Pa. D. & C. 590 (1954)

Weissman et ux. v. Weissman et al.

Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania.

March 15, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Arronson, for plaintiffs.

Roper & Caldwell, for defendant Meyer Weissman.

Michael Edelman, for Benjamin H. Weissman, administrator of estate of Abraham Weissman, deceased.

ALESSANDRONI, J., March 15, 1954.

Benjamin H. Weissman, administrator of the estate of Abraham Weissman, deceased, has filed a petition for a rule for leave to intervene. Plaintiffs, Rose and Bertha Weissman, filed an answer to the petition in the nature of a demurrer. Defendant Rose Weissman did not answer; defendant Meyer Weissman filed a responsive answer. Depositions were taken in support of the rule.

The facts underlying the action in which petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases