KING v. PRINCE

34935.

89 Ga. App. 588 (1954)

80 S.E.2d 222

KING v. PRINCE.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Rehearing Denied February 3, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Holderness & Word, for plaintiff in error.

Boykin & Boykin, James F. McNamara, contra.


GARDNER, P. J.

"If the tort complained of does not amount to a crime, the person injured may consent to a satisfaction and settlement thereof." Code § 105-1901. "An agreement by a creditor to receive less than the amount of his debt cannot be pleaded as an accord and satisfaction, unless it be actually executed by the payment of the money." Code § 20-1204. The defendant here paid the money. The plaintiff testified, "I have been fully paid and satisfied as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases