1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 266 Wis.
  5. 266 Wis. 410 (1954)
 

GUSCHL v. SCHMIDT

266 Wis. 410 (1954)

GUSCHL, Respondent, vs. SCHMIDT and wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 6, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Anderson & Murphy, attorneys, and J. Stewart Murphy of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by J. Stewart Murphy.

For the respondent there was a brief by Erbstoeszer, Cleary & Decker of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Vernon Erbstoeszer.

CURRIE, J.

Counsel for the defendant owners contend on this appeal that under finding of fact No. 23 contained in the so-called "supplemental" findings of fact the defendant owners are entitled to judgment against the plaintiff contractor on their counterclaim for the entire $5,600 paid by them on the contract price. Said finding is to the effect that the house as remodeled is of less value than prior to the remodeling.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases