WATSON UNEMPL. COMPENSATION CASE


176 Pa.Super. 490 (1954)

Watson Unemployment Compensation Case.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

November 9, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Herbert Syme, for appellant.

William L. Hammond, Special Deputy Attorney General, with him Frank F. Truscott, Attorney General, for appellee.

Samuel A. Schreckengaust, Jr., with him McNees, Wallace & Nurick, for intervening appellees.

Before RHODES, P.J., ROSS, GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE and ERVIN, JJ. (HIRT, J., absent).


OPINION BY WRIGHT, J., November 9, 1954:

In this unemployment compensation case Rose M. Watson (hereinafter referred to as claimant) was denied benefits by the bureau, the referee, and the Board of Review on the ground that she refused to accept suitable employment without good cause under the provisions of Section 402(a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law. The question involved is whether the 1953 amendment to Section 402(b),1 considered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases