KRUPAR v. P. & G. CO.

No. 33452.

160 Ohio St. 489 (1954)

KRUPAR, APPELLEE, v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO., APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 20, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard B. Kay and Mr. A. F. Gallagher, for appellee.

Mr. J. R. Kistner, for appellant.


WEYGANDT, C. J.

The plaintiff contends that he is entitled to recover on either or both of the theories of negligence and implied warranty.

However, neither was mentioned in his original petition. But at the inception of the trial he obtained leave of the court to amend his petition by interlining the two phrases, "by the negligence of the defendant" and "impliedly warranted to be fit for the purposes for which it was manufactured."

In his opening...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases