1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 270 S.W.2d
  5. 270 S.W.2d 377 (1954)
 

BUTCHER v. MOSBY

270 S.W.2d 377 (1954)

BUTCHER et ux. v. MOSBY et al.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

July 23, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wallace Lopez, Memphis, for complainants, Albert Butcher and wife.

Strauch & Jones, Memphis, for complainants, Willie Truce and wife.

Charles L. Neely, Memphis, for complainants, Walter Hiley and wife.

John Aycock, Memphis, for complainant, Vassie Brister.

William L. Allan, Lee Winchester, Jr., and Winchester & Bearman, Memphis, for defendant, Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co.

PER CURIAM.

In denying the petition of Mr. Butcher and wife for writ of certiorari we did not file a memorandum. This was because we considered such filing to be unnecessary. Ludlow v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co., 188 Tenn. 227, 218 S.W.2d 65. This has resulted in the filing by Mr. Butcher and wife of a petition to rehear. Their insistence is that we should grant the writ in order to thereafter write an opinion construing Section 1713 of the Code. The petition suggests...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases