1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 267 Wis.
  5. 267 Wis. 373 (1954)
 

UMENTUM v. ARENDT

267 Wis. 373 (1954)

UMENTUM, Appellant, vs. ARENDT and wife, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 5, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Warne, Duffy & Dewane of Green Bay, and oral argument by Lloyd O. Warne.

For the respondents there was a brief by Neumann & Slatky, and oral argument by Albert F. Neumann, all of Kewaunee.

MARTIN, J.

Plaintiff does not take the position that the findings of the jury are not supported by the evidence nor does he ask for a new trial. He bases his case upon the theory that the law of bailment operates to require a bailee to redeliver the property at the end of the term and if he does not do so, the bailor has the right to consider the bailment as continued or renewed, citing Nudd v. Montanye (1875), 38 Wis. 511; Enos v. Cole (1881), 53 Wis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases