CUMMINGS v. CUMMINGS

34951.

89 Ga. App. 529 (1954)

80 S.E.2d 204

CUMMINGS v. CUMMINGS, Executor.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided January 20, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Erle M. Donalson, for plaintiff in error.

Julian Webb, contra.


GARDNER, P. J.

1. It is the cardinal and fundamental rule that in construing contracts the entire writing is to be taken into consideration to ascertain the intent of the parties and, if the same can be ascertained, that intention should govern. Bridges v. Home Guano Co., 33 Ga.App. 305, 309 (125 S. E. 872), and cit. The court, in its decision of the law of this case, evidently followed and applied this principle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases