HONIGFELD v. BYRNES


14 N.J. 600 (1954)

103 A.2d 598

DAVID M. HONIGFELD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM BYRNES, INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 15, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis Schwartz argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Schwartz & Schwartz, attorneys; Mr. Sol Schwartz, on the brief).

Mr. Louis Nussman argued the cause for respondents (Mr. George Dimond, on the brief).


The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.

In an effort to provide additional space to accommodate guests of his hotel situated on East 33rd Street, Paterson, the plaintiff made certain improvements in a small, one-story building on the rear portion of the same plot as the main hotel building. When the building inspector, one of the parties defendant, denied the application for a certificate of occupancy "to occupy and use the accessory building in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases