RUTLEDGE v. RUTLEDGE


268 S.W.2d 343 (1954)

RUTLEDGE v. RUTLEDGE.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

May 21, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary Guidi, Memphis, for plaintiff in error.

Strauch & Jones, Memphis, for defendant in error.


BURNETT, Justice.

The only question for our review in this case is whether or not the trial court, court of original jurisdiction, may grant the wife alimony and attorney's fees pending an appeal in the appellate court by her husband after the case has been disposed of in the trial court and is pending in the appellate court. The question is very fully and thoroughly annotated in 19 A.L.R.2d 703, et seq.

In addition to this question the paintiff in error has...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases