SACRAMENTO ETC. DRAINAGE DIST. v. TRUSLOW

Docket No. 8226.

125 Cal.App.2d 478 (1954)

270 P.2d 928

SACRAMENTO AND SAN JOAQUIN DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WALLACE B. TRUSLOW et al., Appellants; FRANK E. KING, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

May 25, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl S. Patterson, William B. Borthwick, Wm. P. Mealey, Carl E. Rodegerdts, Chalmers, Cowing & Sans, E.L. Means and James F. Roach for Appellants.

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Walter S. Rountree, Assistant Attorney General, Raymond H. Williamson and John Morris, Deputy Attorneys General, and Robert W. James, Assistant Administrative Adviser, State Reclamation District, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Mento, Buchler & Littlefield and George K. Littlefield for Defendant and Respondent.


VAN DYKE, P.J.

Basically, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Drainage District was created and is operated for the purpose of carrying out a general flood control project for the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries. The waters discharged into these streams at flood times are far in excess of the carrying capacity of the river channels. In the Sacramento Valley, to supplement this carrying capacity, lands have been set aside as by-passes in which the excess...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases