TAFT, J.
If the tests applied by this court under the mechanics' lien law are applicable, Carver-Behan Company was a materialman of the general contractor and not a subcontractor, and plaintiff was a materialman of Carver-Behan Company. It is apparent therefore that, if those tests are applicable, the plaintiff was a materialman of a materialman of the general contractor.
Thus, the question to be determined is whether one who, under the tests applied under...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.