1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 73 So.2d
  5. 73 So.2d 521 (1954)
 

HUDSON v. STRIPLING

6 Div. 707.

73 So.2d 521 (1954)

HUDSON v. STRIPLING.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 24, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jackson, Rives, Pettus & Peterson, Birmingham, for appellant.

Taylor, Higgins, Windham & Perdue, Birmingham, for appellee.

STAKELY, Justice.

In the case of Hudson v. Stripling, Ala. Sup., 73 So.2d 514, all the assignments of error pertaining to this case were covered except the 4th and 5th assignments which raise the question of excessiveness of the verdict in this case. There is testimony tending to show that William F. Stripling had expenses totaling $1,500 in treating his daughter. The balance of the recovery, therefore, must be ascribed to loss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases