1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 83 S.E.2d
  5. 83 S.E.2d 501 (1954)
 

CAROLINA DRIVE-UR-SELF v. MAIDEN

No. 105.

83 S.E.2d 501 (1954)

240 N.C. 629

CAROLINA DRIVE-UR-SELF, Inc. v. James B. MAIDEN, trading and doing business under the firm name and style of Allied Roofing Company.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ward & Bennett, Asheville, for plaintiff, appellee.

S. J. Pegram and William J. Cocke, Asheville, for defendant, appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Due and careful consideration has been given to each assignment of error presented by the appellant on this appeal, and we find no error in the trial below of sufficient merit to warrant a disturbance of the judgment entered in the Superior Court. The facts are simple. The applicable rules of law well established. There is no need for further discussion. All the defendant's assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment below is

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases