1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 275 P.2d
  5. 275 P.2d 304 (1954)
 

YOUNG v. WEST EDMOND HUNTON LIME UNIT

No. 35316.

275 P.2d 304 (1954)

J.M. YOUNG and Kate Young, Plaintiffs in Error, v. WEST EDMOND HUNTON LIME UNIT, a body politic and corporate, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Rehearing Denied September 28, 1954.

Application for Leave to File Second Petition for Rehearing Denied October 19, 1954.

Dissenting Opinion October 30, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Barry, La Jolla, Cal., Wayne W. Bayless, Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error.

Robinson, Shipp, Robertson & Barnes, Oklahoma City, and George Hazlett, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant in error.

WELCH, Justice.

The facts are not in dispute.

The plaintiffs owned the mineral interest and rights in a certain one-half section and a one-quarter section of land (total 480 acres). The mineral interests in these lands, in respective separate tracts, were leased to Sohio Petroleum Company, Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, and Peppers Refining Company. The said lands became productive of oil and gas, and adjoining lands also became productive of oil and gas....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases