PETERSON v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO.


32 N.J. Super. 23 (1954)

107 A.2d 668

ALBERT D. PETERSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 3, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. A. Leo Bohl argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Nathan Rabinowitz argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges SPEAKMAN, HEGARTY and CONLON.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SPEAKMAN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

On February 23, 1950 defendant issued to the plaintiff its policy of insurance insuring him against loss resulting directly and independently of all other causes from accidental bodily injuries sustained during the term thereof, which contained the following provisions pertinent to this controversy:

"Section 1 TOTAL DISABILITY...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases