ADAMS v. CULLEN

No. 32548.

44 Wn.2d 502 (1954)

268 P.2d 451

CHESTER V. ADAMS et al., Appellants, v. FRANK CULLEN et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

April 2, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Huneke & van Tyen, for appellants.

Wilmot W. Garvin, for respondents.


WEAVER, J.

Can an easement by implication be created by implied reservation?

This is an appeal from a judgment declaring that respondents have an easement for ingress and egress across the land of appellants. The judgment orders appellants to remove certain obstructions from the right of way.

Appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Adams, are the owners of the servient estate. Mr. and Mrs. Cullen, the respondents, own the dominant estate. For brevity, we will only...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases