1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 31 N.J.
  5. 31 N.J. Super. 514 (1954)
 

NEW AMSTERDAM CAS. CO. v. POPOVICH

31 N.J. Super. 514 (1954)

107 A.2d 345

NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NICHOLAS POPOVICH, SR., AND NICHOLAS POPOVICH, JR. INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS N. POPOVICH & SON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 29, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry Schaffer argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Waxman & Waxman, attorneys).

Mr. Reuben P. Goldstein argued the cause for the defendants-respondents.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, FRANCIS and FREUND.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, New Amsterdam Casualty Company, from a judgment of no cause of action entered upon a jury verdict at the second trial of this case. A summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff entered at the first trial had been reversed, New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. Popovich, 27 N.J.Super. 40 (App. Div. 1953). The plaintiff now...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases