1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 29 N.J.
  5. 29 N.J. Super. 514 (1954)
 

TRENTON v. LENZNER

29 N.J. Super. 514 (1954)

103 A.2d 13

CITY OF TRENTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ISADORE LENZNER AND FREDA LENZNER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PRINCETON, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN S. VAN NEST, MORTGAGEE, WILLIAM EARDLEY, SOL BRODER, ROY ADAMS, MICHAEL CUNNINGHAM AND FRED BARTEL, TENANTS, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 8, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John A. Hartpence argued the cause for appellants (Mr. David Frankel, attorney).

Mr. Louis Josephson argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

Accommodations for the parking of motor vehicles on the public streets in or in reasonable proximity to the mercantile sections of urban municipalities have in recent years been exhausted or justifiably restricted or forbidden in order to relieve the vehicular traffic on such streets of congestion. Consequently the subject attained the proportions of a problem...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases