HOTT v. WARNER


268 Wis. 264 (1954)

HOTT, Respondent, vs. WARNER, Administratrix, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 7, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Kading & Kading of Watertown, and oral argument by Charles E. Kading.

For the respondent there was a brief by Dakin & Dierker of Watertown, and oral argument by Harold M. Dakin and by Jack Trager of Ottawa, Illinois.


STEINLE, J.

Counsel for defendant upon oral argument and in their brief ask the court to consider the relationship of the parties both before and after the divorce action and certain equities which they feel should have some effect upon the determination of the issues. We consider, however, that the issues are determined by rules of law which would prevent the court from considering the equities which defendant claims should have some bearing.

At the time...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases