PER CURIAM.
Such evidence as there is to indicate that Mrs. Ruscher, as a partner of her husband, owned any part of the assets transferred to the petitioner in exchange for its stock is too inconclusive to show that the Tax Court was in error in treating Mr. Ruscher as the sole transferrer. With this observation, we are content to affirm the decision on the opinion of the Tax Court,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.