1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 121 F.Supp.
  5. 121 F.Supp. 409 (1954)
 

RAY-O-VAC v. CHICAGO & N. W. RY. CO.

No. 2344.

121 F.Supp. 409 (1954)

RAY-O-VAC v. CHICAGO & N. W. RY. CO.

United States District Court, W. D. Wisconsin.

June 8, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ralph E. Axley and Floyd A. Brynelson of the firm of Schubring, Ryan, Petersen & Sutherland, Madison, Wis., for plaintiff.

E. H. Borgelt of Quarles, Spence & Quarles, Milwaukee, Wis., Sam D. Parker, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.

STONE, District Judge.

Findings of Fact

1. Plaintiff is a Wisconsin corporation with its general offices in Madison, Wisconsin, and is engaged in the manufacture and sale of dry batteries and flashlights.

Defendant is a Wisconsin corporation engaged in business as a common carrier by railroad.

The amount in controversy exceeds the sum of $3,000, and defendant's liability, if any, arises under the Uniform Bill of Lading, and presents a Federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases