CIERPIAL v. FORD MOTOR CO.


31 N.J. Super. 489 (1954)

107 A.2d 61

FRANK CIERPIAL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 9, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Arthur J. Sills argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer & Sills, attorneys).

Mr. Verling C. Enteman argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys; Mr. Stuart A. Young, Jr., of counsel).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, FREUND and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.

In this workmen's compensation case, we are in concurrence with the dismissal by the Division of Workmen's Compensation of the petition at the conclusion of the claimant's proofs and the affirmance by the County Court.

The record discloses that the appellant suffered injuries at his place of employment on April 30, 1952. A fellow employee, Jack Keen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases