1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 211 F.2d
  5. 211 F.2d 309 (1954)
 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. RADCLIFFE

No. 13726.

211 F.2d 309 (1954)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. RADCLIFFE et al.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 27, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, H. T. Herrick, Attys., NLRB, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Eli A. Weston, J. L. Eberle, Boise, Idaho, for respondents.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, POPE, Circuit Judge, and DRIVER, District Judge.

DRIVER, District Judge.

The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order, based upon findings that respondents C. W. Radcliffe and W. W. Mancke, co-partners doing business as Homedale Tractor & Equipment Company, engaged in unfair labor practices. Specifically, the Board's findings are that respondents interfered with union organizational activities of its employees by the strategically timed announcement of a profit-sharing plan, interrogated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases